美国流行音乐明星Lizzo的制作公司Big Grrrl Big Touring面临的诉讼遭到法院驳回。1美国地区法院法官Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha于本周二驳回了前服装助理Asha Daniels对该公司提出的剩余索赔。1Lizzo随后在Instagram上表示感到欣慰，并宣布将继续为自己和公司进行辩护。1
Daniels曾在2023年短期为Big Grrrl Big Touring工作，指控遭受"贬低、强制体力劳动、拒绝医疗、性骚扰和种族骚扰"。1法官认为这些指控的行为虽"不恰当和不专业"，但属于"工作场所的日常困扰"。1Daniels还声称脚被沉重衣架碾过，但法院裁定该伤害"不符合《美国残疾人法》下的残疾定义"。12024年，该法官已在此前裁定Daniels不能以个人名义起诉Lizzo，但该公司仍保持被告身份。1
Lizzo在社交媒体上表示"真相对我比什么都重要"，将"继续为每一项针对我和我的业务提出的恶意指控而奋斗"。1此前，Lizzo的三名前巡演舞者也曾提起过单独诉讼。1
U.S. District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha dismissed the remaining claims in a lawsuit filed against Lizzo's production company Big Grrrl Big Touring on Tuesday 1. The case was brought by former wardrobe assistant Asha Daniels, who had alleged she experienced "demeaning conduct, forced physical labor, denial of medical care, sexual harassment, and racial harassment" during her brief employment with the company in 2023 1.
In an Instagram post, Lizzo expressed relief at the decision, stating that "truth matters more to me than anything" and pledging to "continue to fight every single malicious allegation made against me and my business" 1. The judge found that while the alleged behaviors were "inappropriate and unprofessional," they constituted "ordinary tribulations of the workplace" rather than actionable violations 1. Additionally, the court rejected Daniels' claim that an injury from a heavy garment rack qualified as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, determining the harm did not meet that definition 1. A 2024 ruling had previously barred Daniels from suing Lizzo individually, though the production company remained a defendant 1. The lawsuit was initially filed in September 2023, following separate claims brought by three of Lizzo's former touring dancers 1.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。