澳大利亚自由党、一国党和工党在移民政策上的具体细节仍处于混乱状态，加剧了国家移民辩论的不确定性。自由党发言人乔诺·邓尼姆表示，该党最终的移民政策数字不会在2026年发布1。与此同时，一国党关于净海外移民（NOM）数字的立场也存在混淆，党内主张NOM为130,000人，但新议员戴维·法利随后又提及可能还有额外100,000人1。工党则承诺在两年内将NOM从约300,000降至225,0001。
三党在移民数字的计算方法和政策实施上存在显著差异。政府新兴农业劳动力（PALM）计划涵盖约33,000名工人，国家党领导人巴纳比·乔伊斯确认这些工人多数不被计入NOM1。一国党领导人宝琳·汉森删除了一条早期推文，其中所述数据在数学上会导致NOM进入负数1。这些政策上的不一致和含糊之处反映出各党在移民问题上仍未就具体执行措施达成共识。
Australia's three major political parties remain at odds over immigration targets and policy specifics, creating confusion in the national debate over net overseas migration. The Liberal Party has confirmed it will not release its final immigration policy numbers in 2026, according to a statement from party spokesperson Jonno Duniam 1. Meanwhile, One Nation and the Labor Party have also left key details unresolved or inconsistent.
One Nation claims a net overseas migration (NOM) target of 130,000, yet the party's position has become muddled after newly elected member David Farley referenced a potential additional 100,000 people, suggesting internal inconsistency within the party's messaging 1. Labor has set a more ambitious goal, targeting a reduction of NOM from approximately 300,000 to 225,000 within two years 1. However, the party has not yet disclosed the specific measures it will implement to achieve this reduction.
The disagreement extends to how migration numbers are calculated. The Pacific Australia Labor Mobility (PALM) program covers approximately 33,000 workers, and Barnaby Joyce has confirmed that the majority of these workers are not counted toward NOM figures 1. Adding to the confusion, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson deleted an earlier tweet whose underlying data would have mathematically resulted in a negative NOM figure 1. These discrepancies underscore the broader lack of clarity and consistency across all three parties regarding both their immigration targets and the methodologies used to measure them.
评论
还没有评论，欢迎留下第一条。